30 September 2010

Additions to RCAA Library

Airports create health hazards & other environmental challenges.  A recent addition to the RCAA library calls attention to the risks to health that are associated with aircraft noise.  A second new publication, from the US GAO, reviews the actions of airport operators in dealing with health & other environmental issues that seem to arise almost every time an airport seeks to expand.

Skeptics who deny that aircraft noise has serious effects on human health should spend a thoughtful hour or so, perusing "A Review of the Literature Related to Potential  Health Effects if Aircraft Noise", published in July by a joint effort of the FAA, NASA, & Transport Canada.  We recommend this to anyone concerned about aircraft noise but unsure of how serious the problem is.

The GAO report was published (on the web) a few days ago.  It's turgid reading, replete with abbreviations & acronyms (mostly unfamiliar), but it does confirm that environmental issues (noise high on the list) are contributing to delays in major expansion at airports all over the U.S. The report leaves a feeling that much was left unsaid, & at least one reader has told us that it seems aimed at placating those who feel that airports aren't doing anything about the environment.  The GAO's conclusion is that most are doing something, & the inference is "Oh, goody!". But whether it's enough, or is actually relevant ... that really is what is important but isn't addressed candidly.  The title is a guide to the mindset of the writers:  "Systematically Addressing Environmental Impacts and Community Concerns Can Help Airports Reduce Project Delays", GAO-10-50.  It is assumed that all airport projects are worthy & should not be delayed.  If an airport is seen to be "addressing" environmental issues, projects should be able to move forward more briskly.

One finds at p. 37 of the GAO report some discussion of Federal legislation that had escaped RCAA's notice, "The Aviation Streamlining Approval Process Act of 2003".  We know nothing about this legislation.

*  *  *

Although RCAA was consulted by the GAO team while they were doing their research, the report does not go into detail about either Sea-Tac or Boeing Field, & RCAA's views are not reflected in the report.  Not that that is important.

* * *  * * *

To borrow arrange to borrow a copy of either report, e-mail the RCAA office.  


16 September 2010

Flim-Flam Artists at Work

A comment on the Part 150 noise study at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

The work of the Part 150 noise-study team is almost over. The basic contents of the final report are already available in the study team’s presentation on 29 July to the so-called Technical Review Committee. (Available at the special website for the study.) Even a casual look at slide 32 in that presentation will show how very little is being proposed for noise relief or noise mitigation. This is not much result for a study that will cost more than a million dollars.

The really interesting part of this process is the "flim-flam" that has gone on. As any good magician knows, success comes by getting the audience looking one way while he is working in the other direction. 

Almost all of the public meetings/process were directed at the way the Part 150 study was being conducted. While this was going on, the study consultants, Landrum & Brown, were working outside of the public view or review on the actual subjects of the study. 

In July they published the "2009 noise contour maps", the "Aviation planning forecast", and the outline of the "Noise Compatibility Plan". These are the required basics of a Part 150 process.

A Part 150 study is supposed to look at NOISE REDUCTION, NOISE MITIGATION, and LAND USE PLANNING. The noise-study team have successfully completed a Part 150 study without touching any of these topics.


09 September 2010

Next Noise Workshop Scheduled for 27 October

The study team for the Sea-Tac noise study has announced that the next public workshop will be held on Wednesday, 27 October, at Mt Rainier High School, in Des Moines.  See below for details.

Since the last workshop (9 June), the study team has prepared air-traffic forecasts for the Airport (with no public input or participation).  The traffic forecasts have been used to prepare noise-exposure maps (with no public input or participation).  The study team is also preparing maps to show noise-sensitive areas & facilities (again with no public input or participation).  All these maps will presumably be available at the workshop.  

The study team has, so far, rejected requests to extend the noise mapping out to the 55 YDNL contour.  The work is restricted to the small area within the 65 YDNL contour.  The study team calculates that there are 6.30 square miles within that contour.  Almost half (2.96 square miles) is within the Airport itself.  The study team has strongly indicated that it will not propose any mitigation or noise-relieving measures for non-Airport areas outside the 65 YDNL contour.  In other words, mitigation & noise relief is under consideration for only 3.34 square miles very close to the Airport.  Too bad about the noise in Federal Way, in the Shorewood neighborhood of Burien, in other parts of the greater Highline area, & in Beacon Hill & Rainier Valley in Seattle, & points north & south.

The text of the announcement follows:


Third Part 150 Study Public Workshop Set for October 27th

Part 150 Study also an Agenda Item at September 22nd Highline Forum

 

The community is invited to attend the third in a series of public workshops for Sea-Tac Airport's Part 150 Noise Study on October 27th at Mount Rainier High School (22450 19th Ave. S.) in Des Moines.  The program is from 6:30 PM to 8:30 PM.  

At the workshop, the new airport-area noise exposure "contour" maps showing neighborhoods currently affected by noise and those that will be affected by noise in the future will be unveiled and discussed.  As with the last two workshops, small group working sessions will be utilized to foster conversation and actively develop solutions to reducing airport noise.  

On September 22nd, the members of the Highline Forum will also discuss the Part 150 Noise Study at the City of Des Moines Activity Center - 2045 South 216th Street, Des Moines.  The meeting begins at 2:30 and the public is invited to observe.  The Highline Forum includes the southwest King County communities of Des Moines, Burien, Normandy Park, SeaTac, Tukwila and Federal Way and the Highline School District and Port of Seattle.

Please visit the dedicated Part 150 Study website for all documentation and reports connected to the study including the comprehensive summary from the June 9th public workshop.

 

 

Sea-Tac Airport Can't But Boeing Can

Since the start of the noise study at Sea-Tac Airport, our organization has asked for air-traffic forecasts for the Airport for the next 20 years.  We've been told by the study team (led by the consultancy Landrum & Brown) that such forecasts are next to impossible.   Never mind that for purposes of justifying Sea-Tac expansion the same consultants (& the Airport) were able to make 20-year forecasts. For purposes of mitigation, it's just too hard to figure what air travel will do in 20 years.

Well, as it turns out, the Boeing Company has a different view.  The news item below, found in a recent issue of the on-line aviation daily news service, "Airwise", tells us all that Boeing feels quite confident that they can predict the general direction for 20 years to the point that they are willing to go public with estimates of how many passenger aircraft will be needed to meet travel demand. 

Here's something that might help Landrum & Brown to figure it all out -- the main phone number for Boeing's commercial-aircraft division:  206-655-1131.

Now the news item:

------------------------------------------------------ Boeing Sees USD$700 Bln Market In North America ------------------------------------------------------ September 3, 2010 Boeing has reiterated that it expects North American airlines
to take delivery of about 7,200 new planes over the next 20 years
at a value of about USD$700 billion. Details: http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1283497136.html