28 October 2009

FAA regulations in hard copy

Some of us don't much care for reading complicated text on our computer screens. And some of us aren't too keen about using our personal computer-printers to print out big documents.  

If this describes you, & if you want to read the FAA's regulations about noise-reduction programs ("Part 150 studies") & about changing flight procedures for noise abatement ("Part 161"), boy, does RCAA have a deal for you !

We've downloaded & printed both of those regulations (both are parts of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations) --- & we will lend you copies of either or both, if you are looking for some turgid reading.  Be the first on your block .... !   (No decoder rings come with this, though.)

And if you DO want to read these regulations on your computer, or run off a copy of your own, we like this website for Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations 

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=a6a107fe3d2d2cbe46fe93c2e9d0c769&rgn=div5&view=text&node=14:3.0.1.3.18&idno=14

Phone or e-mail the RCAA office to set a day & time to sign out either or both of these documents:  rcaa@earthlink.net    206.824.3120

14 October 2009

Salmon are coming in Miller Creek

Autumn work on Miller Creek

From Dennis Clark, the Miller/Walker Creek Basin Steward

The first salmon of the season on Miller Creek was sighted on Saturday at the Cove in Normandy Park! Let’s do our part to create a more healthy stream for this fish and its buddies!   

Join us this Saturday to help plant 37 trees and do a final bit of weeding on Miller Creek at S. 144th St. west of Des Moines Memorial Drive in Burien. You’ll work under the yellowing leaves of the cottonwoods and enjoy a classic fall day out-of-doors.  

Planting time is 9 a.m. Saturday, October 17. With enough volunteers, we can get the work done in two hours. 

Details are in the flyer you can download. 

RSVP so I have enough tools and doughnuts for all. If you are a student, please have your parent/guardian complete the attached form. 

Want to plant trees but can’t make this date? I have another planting project with a private group that would welcome other volunteers on Sunday, October 25, 9 a.m. Let me know if you’d like to join.

 

Dennis Clark

206-296-1909 additional contact information  

Miller/Walker Creek Basin Steward  



Tremendous victory for London-area residents !

It CAN be done.  Communities under the threat of airport expansion CAN stop ill-advised projects -- using political muscle.  The much-battered residents of the London area have apparently won their long struggle against a third runway at Heathrow, now that the Conservative Party (the Tories) have taken the communities' side.   A full account follows.  (And by the way, the Birmingham (U.K.) Airport helped, by unexpectedly announcing just a few days ago that it would be happy, happy to take Heathrow's "extra" traffic.)

Our thanks to Mark Middleton-Smith, a long-time campaigner against the Heathrow project, for the following article.   The "Times" is the Times of London.

* * *

David Dyson The Sunday Times October 11, 2009

THE airport operator BAA has bowed to opposition to a third runway at Heathrow airport. It will not submit a planning application before the general election and will not sign large contracts to "bounce" a future Conservative government into accepting it.

Senior BAA figures have also told the Tories the company will cease to fight for the third runway if they form the next government.

Theresa Villiers, the shadow transport secretary, said: "Last week BAA conveyed to us at our party conference that it will not be submitting a planning application before the election.

"It seems BAA has woken up to the fact that we mean what we say on Heathrow and that if we win the general election there will be no third runway."

Labour pushed through the runway plan despite the opposition of Hilary Benn, the environment secretary, and Ed Miliband, the energy and climate secretary. Residents and campaigners accused ministers of sacrificing their green credentials to the aviation lobby.

Geoff Hoon, then transport secretary, approved the £9 billion third runway and sixth terminal last January and ministers indicated the project would be rushed through, making it more difficult for the Tories to overturn the decision.

The announcement at last week's Conservative conference that a Tory government would block expansion of London's big airports has forced BAA to reappraise the scheme. Its new stance means the taxpayer will not be forced to pay a large sum in compensation for any wasted work.

Publicly, BAA executives are urging the Tories not to "close the door" on expansion plans and say they are still working on the project. But they admitted they were surrendering in a meeting with aides to Villiers last week.

BAA said: "We will always respect the right of the government to take the decision it thinks is the right one." Some suspect BAA's position is a tactical ploy and it will continue to work behind the scenes to convince the Tories of the need for expansion.

But the scheme's opponents are delighted.

"The game is up for BAA," said Edward Lister, leader of Wandsworth council and spokesman for the 2M Group, an alliance of local authorities opposing expansion. "The third runway will never happen and they know it. It's a spectacular result for the campaign."

John Stewart, chairman of Hacan (Heathrow Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise) ClearSkies, said: "There are all sorts of reasons that businesses come to London and Heathrow is just one of them."

Expansion of Heathrow risked undermining Britain's commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050. It was also claimed expansion would breach European limits on nitrogen dioxide levels around the airport.

BAA and British Airways said the runway was needed to ensure Heathrow can compete with large European airports. The airport operator wanted annual flights to increase from 480,000 to more than 700,000.

A group of councils, backed by Boris Johnson, the London mayor, is seeking a judicial review of Hoon's decision, arguing the consultation process was flawed and the decision irrational. A High Court hearing is expected later this year.

Greenpeace has a plot of land on the site of the proposed runway, with the ownership split between thousands of its supporters. Those who said they would never sell their plots to BAA include Emma Thompson, the actress, and Alistair McGowan, the comedian.

Business groups argue Heathrow will fall into decline unless it is allowed to expand. Lord Soley, campaign director of Future Heathrow, said: "The Conservatives will have to find another international hub or reverse their decision."

The Tories also oppose second runways at Stansted and Gatwick. They are likely to consider building a new international hub. Boris Johnson supports the building of a new airport at the Thames Estuary and BAA said it was now prepared to consider the estuary option, previously dismissed as costly and "unrealistic" by critics.


Interested in night-time noise? A view from Europe

Here's a link to a lengthy guidance document from the European office of the World Health Organization on the subject of night-time noise.   We'd be glad to hear from any readers who are willing to peruse this whole thing & tell us how it may be of help in dealing with the noise problems that arise from operations at Sea-Tac and Boeing Field. 

Readers will recall that there is a night-time noise element in the INM computer model that draws the 65 DNL contour maps relied on by the Port of Seattle as the only way to measure bad impacts from noise.  (long sentence!  sorry!)  What are the implications if the European guidance were to be included in the INM?

If the link fails, here's the URL that you can paste into your brower in the usual way:

http://www.euro.who.int/document/e92845.pdf

13 October 2009

Noise is where you hear it

Here's a link to a news story in a Seattle neighborhood blog about a recent Sea-Tac noise meeting in the central part of Seattle.  It's NOT just some folks who "moved down by the Airport" who are affected.

The comments on the blog's story are instructive.  The underlying thought beneath such comments appears to be, "The end always justifies the means, however destructive, however unnecessary, the means are."  

If the link fails, try pasting the URL into your browser in the good old-fashioned manner --

http://www.centraldistrictnews.com/2009/10/12/airplane-noise-no-changes-any-time-soon

08 October 2009

No public participation in Part 150 study yet

Unofficial word just in that Sea-Tac Airport staff have selected the consultant for the pending Part 150 study -- Landrum & Brown, a well-known aviation consultancy. In an e-mail to a local citizen, Stan Shepherd, manager of airport noise programs, has mentioned that a consultant has been selected, but did not identify that firm.

So far as we know, this selection was made privately, by staff alone, & with no public participation of any sort.  A private selection implies that Airport staff have already determined the work that they want the consultants to do -- & the work that they do NOT want the consultants to do.  At the moment, we do not know if the Port Commissioners were involved in the selection process.

More on this as we learn more.

Dates for work on center runway

No decision has been made by the Port Commission as to potential "rehabilitation" of the center runway at Sea-Tac Airport, according to Elizabeth Leavitt, the Airport's director of aviation planning & environmental programs.   Tentative plans by staff call for replacement of "specific runway panels", a project that would be completed by year 2012.  This work would be followed by a more complete rehabilitation in about the year 2016.  Ms Leavitt notes if "large scale failure of the concrete" is observed, the rehabilitation might be needed sooner.

Presumably, a "complete rehabilitation" would require a complete shut-down of the center runway, accompanied by full-time, all-weather use of the third runway, with attendant noise impacts.   It is not yet clear whether the Airport will consider that additional noise in its environmental review of the center-runway project.  Noise was not considered in the environmental assessment of the just-completed first-runway reconstruction.

07 October 2009

If airplane manufacturing is so important ... ?

If airplane manufacturing is so important to the State of Washington, shouldn't our State's leaders, the movers-and-shakers, like the Governor & ex-Senator Gorton, be thinking about creative ways to keep that industry here?  

"Oh," you say, "they ARE, they ARE".  No, not so.  They are worried about keeping the Boeing Co.  Not the same thing.  

Couldn't some gutsy investor (the name of Paul Allen springs to one's lips) set up a NEW company, & begin bidding on manufacturing for the whole world-wide industry?  There are lots more airframe manufacturers out there, beside Boeing & Airbus.  It's been said that Boeing doesn't really want to be in the manufacturing business, anyway.  

Submitted by OBSERVER

What's a major airport worth?

Here's a breaking news item (on an e-mail news service) that caught our eye.  A major sophisticated investor is willing to pay $2.65 (B) billion for Gatwick Airport, one of the facilities that serves London.   What do you suppose an investor like this would pay for Sea-Tac Airport?  Would you buy stock in Sea-Tac Airport Holdings, Ltd?

------------------------------------------------------

GIP Group Nears Gatwick Airport Purchase Deal
------------------------------------------------------
October 7, 2009
A consortium led by Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) is close to buying London's Gatwick Airport for up to EUR1.8 billion euros (USD$2.65 billion), sources familiar with the deal said on Wednesday.
Details: http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1254950516.html

02 October 2009

Angry crowd at noise meeting

Wondering what happened at the big noise meeting on the 29th?  The B-Town Blog covered the event.  Here's a link to their article.  

RCAA will have comments at a later date.

= = = < * > = = =

If the link doesn't work -- here's the URL -- cut & paste into your browser.

http://www.b-townblog.com/2009/09/30/hundreds-of-angry-residents-confront-port-of-seattle-and-faa-officials-about-airport-noise-at-community-meeting/